- 积分
- 12
贡献67
飞刀17 FD
注册时间2020-4-17
在线时间3 小时
|
楼主 |
发表于 2020-5-14 09:56:14
|
显示全部楼层
root@s5p4418_drone:/ # ping 192.168.0.143
PING 192.168.0.143 (192.168.0.143) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.143: icmp_seq=9 ttl=128 time=30.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.143: icmp_seq=21 ttl=128 time=6.88 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.143: icmp_seq=24 ttl=128 time=17.9 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.143: icmp_seq=30 ttl=128 time=5.32 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.143: icmp_seq=32 ttl=128 time=16.6 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.143 ping statistics ---
33 packets transmitted, 5 received, 84% packet loss, time 32006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.323/15.428/30.381/9.016 ms
root@s5p4418_drone:/ # ping 192.168.0.1
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.02 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=0.876 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=0.969 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
41 packets transmitted, 3 received, 92% packet loss, time 40002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.876/0.957/1.028/0.072 ms
root@s5p4418_drone:/ # ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=17 ttl=55 time=4.86 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=20 ttl=55 time=4.11 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=24 ttl=55 time=3.30 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=31 ttl=55 time=7.10 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=38 ttl=55 time=6.87 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=40 ttl=55 time=5.54 ms
^C
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
40 packets transmitted, 6 received, 85% packet loss, time 39004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3.309/5.301/7.106/1.377 ms
感谢前辈回应。这两个星期所有网路硬体软体都有尝试过了,虽然Android的应用软件都经完成测试,但公司经过考量到我们自身开发能力不足,又欠缺资源的情况下,还是决定用原来的win7PE+PC。虽然成本较高,毕竟五六十台设备出货以后,后续的维护人力与公司信誉问题,价值应该超过这省下的十几万。
|
|